How Internet Marketers Are Protecting Their Good Names

In the movie “Coming to America,” a running gag was a McDonalds Restaurant knock-off called “McDowells.” From color, to layout, to menu items, everything was designed to make money at the expense of McDonalds.

Last year, Starbucks successfully sued one Samantha Buck for operating a coffee shop under the name “Sambucks” with a logo that was similar to that of Starbucks.

Internet marketers are finally understanding the need to protect their names just like traditional brick-and-mortar businesses. Big name online marketers are seeking trademark protection for their names.

Here are a few examples of why this has become necessary.

1. Competitors are using the marketers’ names as pay-per-click (PPC) keywords to drive traffic to other products and services.

2. Goods and services are being sold using the marketers’ names in such a way as to mislead buyers into falsely believing the marketers have in fact endorsed these products and services. This is particularly troubling from a legal standpoint when the products and services are high risk items…such as healthcare products that over-promise results (eg. diet pills) or speculative investments in ventures that violate blue sky laws.

3. Internet marketing gurus’ names are being used in articles as an SEO tool to drive traffic to websites. A repulsive example of that involves publications of articles involving the name of a prominent Internet marketer who recently died. Those publishing the articles are literally robbing the corpse of his good name in order to make money with it. Unfortunately, most don’t realize what is occurring because the articles are written as tributes to the deceased…but with hyperlinks to the target websites where money is to be made.
Many personal names are difficult to assert trademark protection. But those whose names have acquired secondary meanings through their online marketing successes should not have their names abused for financial gain by others.

Share

Internet Attorney: The Future Of Stock Photography And The Internet

As an Internet attorney, I found the following stock photography issue relevant for online entrepreneurs…

Faced with an onslaught of copyright infringement, Roger Ressmeyer, President of the Picture Archive Council of America (PACA), recently gave a speech that included the following stock photography recommendations:

1. Standardize licensing practices.

2. Embed metadata.

3. Use technology to find and pursue infringers.

4. Emulate celebrity image pricing methods for general and stock boutique collections.

5. Protect the pricing of standard rights managed and royalty-free.

6. Defang the orphan work’s legislation pending in Congress.

Each of these is a laudable goal for an industry that has taken some serious hits in recent years. However, as your Internet attorney can explain to you in detail, the effect will be minimal.

As RIAA and the MPAA have discovered, the market is no longer defined by them. Nor can laws passed in Washington protect that which can be accessed via the Internet from a server in Moscow or Sao Paulo.

Publishing giants and entertainment industry experts have preached doom and gloom futures for Google and YouTube for their respective alleged infringement of property rights involving books and video. Yet Google acquires YouTube, and the dinosaur media giants quietly start to make licensing agreements with the company.

Where does this leave stock photography? Fighting the same losing battle. Congress will not control its future. Prices will fall to meet a market demand that includes sufficient alternatives to permanently depress prices. If the images equivalent of Project Gutenberg is ever created, stock photography prices may plummet.

There will always be a demand for high quality images. But with technology making it easier for the amateur shutter bug to create such and provide it royalty-free to the world, PACA needs to create more ambitious goals to ensure the survival of its industry. In addition having an Internet attorney work on infringement issues, stock photo owners needs to develop legal means to sell their content that reduces the incentive for pirates and steal the pics.

Share

Internet Lawyer: Federal Trade Commission Proposed BizOpp Rule

As an Internet lawyer, I originally considered titling this Federal Trade Commission-related post “How To Dupe Marketers Into Paying Capitol Hill Lobbyists” but thought I’d be kind.

For those who have been following the issue, the Federal Trade Commission promulgated a proposed business opportunity rule in April that would essentially destroy MLM/network marketing and curtail the online marketing of business opportunities in general because of draconian disclosure requirements. These disclosures would include earnings disclaimers, contact information for 10 purchasers, etc. If you’re a masochist, Internet lawyer, or have insomnia, here is a link to the proposed rule.
After receiving tens of thousands of hostile public comments, the FTC has made no decision.

However, some online marketers are panicking because they haven’t talked with their Internet lawyer…and the lobbyists are hyping the bogeyman to generate more work.

I telephoned one of the people handling the proposal at the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, Division of Marketing Practices. No rule is imminent. There may never be a rule. There may be hearings. There may be workshops.

There may be a modified rule sometime in the future. That’s likely because the government prefers to control through a combination of taxes and regulation.
If an online marketer decides to pay for lobbying on the issue, make sure that the recipient isn’t the firm of Redundant, Irrelevant & Redundancy. In plain English, make sure the money is actually being spent on something worthwhile instead of duplicating work already being done by others, such as the MLM/network marketing organizations. It is naive to think that the Amways, Primericas, and Mary Kays of the world are going to do nothing as they’re regulated out of business by the Federal Trade Commission. Because I’m an Internet lawyer, I’ll be following this issue closely and probably will post updates if something significant happens.

Share

Free! Get Internet legal and marketing updates plus 3 chapters of the #1 Internet legal protection book for business website owners. Over 40 pages packed with strategies you can use to protect yourself without a lawyer.