7 Internet Law Predictions for 2012

1. Hollywood Retreats

The entertainment industry thought it had bought enough politicians, plus foolish support by GoDaddy (now retracted), to ram through SOPA/PIPA legislation. Pretending to be about property rights, this horrible legislation would cripple ecommerce while allowing politicians in power to crush free speech online.

Now that Google, Amazon, Facebook, etc. are fighting back, together with civil rights groups and social media, it looks like Hollywood will retrench and regroup until after the November 2012 elections. This battle isn’t over by a long shot. Look for the entertainment industry to try one last shot to push through SOPA/PIPA when Congress critters return to D.C. More lipstick will be put on this legislative pig and it will come back in 2013 under a different name (Protect the Children Act, Save the Puppies Act, Don’t Starve Grandma Act, etc.) designed to create more sympathy.

Let’s hope large ecommerce sites continue to fight and GoDaddy has learned its lesson.

2. Privacy Changes

As Congress deadlocks on Internet privacy legislation, look for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to move forward with additional regulatory protection for children. Either in 2012 or the following year, look for bans or severe restrictions on GPS tracking of children by smart phone apps.

In the meantime, the private sector will come up with additional ways to both protect and circumvent Internet privacy. Whatever comes out of Washington will be obsolete before it becomes law.

3. New Biz Opp Disclosure Requirements Ignored

Effective March 1, 2012, there are new FTC biz opp/work-at-home disclosure requirements. Expect most Internet marketers to ignore this requirement. Some will make disclosures that contain misleading information designed to fool consumers. Few will get caught. The FTC will grab some headlines by suing and confiscating assets of a couple of the really bad apples.

4. Internet Sales Taxes Move Forward

The Federal “main street fairness” Internet sales tax legislation will have the support of both Wal-Mart and Amazon. Expect crony capitalists at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to jump on the bandwagon.

Broke states (California, Illinois, etc.) will push heavily for a federal Internet sales tax on the mistaken assumption they will receive a chunk of the tax money from D.C.

The primary advantage that small business website owners have is that the November 2012 elections provide no incentive for the Republican House and the Democrat Senate to cooperate on agreeing to the time of day or anything else. Plus, there seem to be few Republicans in either house that want to face their constituents to defend imposing a new tax in the middle of an economic recession.

5. Want to bet?

It looks like the U.S. Department of Justice is rethinking its use of a 1961 law to arrest and prosecute the owners of Internet gambling sites. Expect broke state governments to push heavily for legalization of intra-state Internet gambling. In other words, these state governments are going to want the federal government to permit gambling sites to be licensed on a state-by-state basis for gambling only by residents within the one state where each site is licensed.

It remains to be seen whether traditional offline gambling interests will support or oppose such plans. Some of the major U.S. casino companies are already investing in joint ventures with European gambling sites with the expectation of rolling out U.S.-based sites once they become legal.

6. Denial of Service

In the interest of “homeland security,” the U.S. government will continue to arbitrarily shut down websites without affording due process in court. There will not be a backlash until the government overreaches and shuts down a social media website that has political backers on Capitol Hill willing to subpoena and grill those involved.

7. Icann of .Coke

The FTC will continue to pressure Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) about the foolish decision to sell .brands generic top level domain extensions for six figures. If ICANN proceeds, expect a wave of lawsuits to swamp the courts as Competitor A buys the .CompetitorB extension to steal traffic away from Competitor B.

…Wishing you the best in the coming year. Let’s hope the politicians don’t muck up ecommerce for small business owners. Congress doesn’t understand the Internet so it should just stay on the sidelines instead of ruining it for the rest of us.

 

Share

The way to find your Dallas website lawyer you actually

The way to find your Dallas website lawyer you actually want

What is your Dallas website lawyer?

your Dallas website lawyer is the closest thing Internet startup owners find to a colleague. Whether you own a limited liability company or other entity, you need representation by a web lawyer.

What does your Dallas website lawyer do?

your Dallas website lawyer focuses on more than the nuts and bolts to make sure Internet startup owners have the right legal documents in place from website legal documents to e-commerce contracts. a web lawyer is going to determine a strategy, based upon your facts, to protect you as an Internet startup owner.

How do you choose your Dallas website lawyer today?

You probably will want to choose your Dallas website lawyer who not only comprehends what you do online but is also a Internet startup owner too. In other words, a web lawyer is a Internet startup owner and also knows Internet business law.

Before you choose a web lawyer, you will want to check out if he knows how ecommerce works plus applicable law, i.e. lots of skill and knows more than just the nuts and bolts. Certainly, if a web lawyer doesnt understand the nuts and bolts of Federal Trade Commission law that affect the Internet and doesnt understand about spam laws, Internet sales taxes, online privacy, etc., you will want to keep hunting until you get your Dallas website lawyer who is capable in these concerns.

You will want to also choose your Dallas website lawyer who has the wisdom and connections to get you some advice for a competent a web lawyer who handles lawsuits if you end up in court.

Think twice if a web lawyer doesnt litigate but pretends to have the skill or proficiency to handle lawsuits simply to keep you as a client. The same is true when a web lawyer with only trial skill pretends to concentrate on transactional law. They are very different varieties of skill handling different concerns under relevant law.

Share

The secret to getting a Dallas cyber attorney you actually

The secret to getting a Dallas cyber attorney you actually need

What is a Dallas cyber attorney?

a Dallas cyber attorney is the closest thing online entrepreneurs find to a colleague. Whether you own a partnership or other entity, you need representation by a web lawyer.

What does a Dallas cyber attorney do?

a Dallas cyber attorney focuses on more than the essentials to make sure online entrepreneurs have the right legal documents in place from website legal documents to e-commerce contracts. a web lawyer is going to decide a course, based upon your data, to protect you as an online entrepreneur.

How do you pick a Dallas cyber attorney immediately?

You probably had better pick a Dallas cyber attorney who not only comprehends what you do online but is also a online entrepreneur too. In other words, a web lawyer is a online entrepreneur and also understands Internet business laws.

Before you pick a web lawyer, you had better check out if he understands how ecommerce works plus applicable laws, i.e. vast capability and understands more than just the essentials. Additionally, if a web lawyer doesnt recognize the essentials of Federal Trade Commission laws that affect the Internet and doesnt recognize about spam laws, Internet sales taxes, online privacy, etc., you had better keep hunting until you get a Dallas cyber attorney who is capable in these legal problems.

You had better also pick a Dallas cyber attorney who has the wisdom and connections to get you a lead for a experienced a web lawyer who handles lawsuits if you end up in court.

Think twice if a web lawyer doesnt litigate but pretends to have the capability or knowledge to handle lawsuits simply to keep you as a client. The same is true when a web lawyer with only trial capability pretends to are experts in transactional laws. They are very different classes of capability handling different legal problems under relevant laws.

Share