If this were a movie prequel, it would be called “Ocean’s 2.”
Co-stars George Clooney and Julia Roberts are suing companies that have been using their photos without permission online in ads to promote the companies’ business.
When it comes to actors, singers, and other celebrities (even “reality” show “stars”), you can land in hot water by using their photos to promote your business unless you’ve got written permission to do so.
Heck, you can’t even imply endorsement. For example, The Oprah reportedly has packs of lawyers hunting down website owners who claim she’s endorsed their products.
As explained in my book, “How to Protect Your Business Website Without a Lawyer” (http://InternetLawsBook.com), intellectual property laws do apply online despite the claims of some fools that photos you find by searching Google are free for the taking.
Even small business website owners screw this one up. For example, there’s a local shop that sends out a daily special to its email list that contains a celebrity birthday of the day. Treading into dangerous territory there because the business isn’t making it clear the celebrities are not endorsing the business. Where the emails cross the line is the business also includes a photo of each celebrity that the company has no right to use.
If you need a celebrity for promoting your business online, there are plenty of C-list actors who are available for chump change. Most people recognize who they are but they haven’t been A-list in years. Even so, whatever deal you work out with them needs to be in writing.
How celebrities can hurt your website
Google-Oracle: Java Infringement Trial Circus
There’s one key lesson you can learn from the clash of Oracle and Google in the courtroom over whether Google’s Java use in Android OS has infringed upon Oracle’s intellectual property rights…
The Internet continues to expose current patent, trademark, and copyright law as obsolete because the legal system is ill-equipped to identify and protect your intellectual property in the 21st Century.
It isn’t a matter of copyright infringement, patent infringement, or trademark infringement. The issue is that intellectual property law cannot keep up, which begs the question of whether it should in the first place.
This isn’t some anti-capitalist rant demanding intellectual property be in the public domain or distributed via a copyleft license. Instead, it is a reflection that current IP laws create trolls (Righthaven) who litigate and dinosaurs who abuse the system (RIAA and MPAA) rather than truly serving the rights of intellectual property owners while promoting entrepreneurial creativity.
So who wins in the Google Oracle Java Android dispute? Absolutely no one except the litigators who profit from it. And that’s a shame.
Internet Blacklisting: Copyright Protection or Censorship?
The United Kingdom’s High Court is ordering ISPs there to block access to The Pirate Bay. This UK decision is the latest by a string of countries to ban the site best known for providing access to bootleg copies of movies and music via BitTorrent.
But let’s face it. The same person who is going to use BitTorrent to pirate content has the tech skills to use proxy servers and other means to access what they want. It’s the typical Web user who is now faces censorship through Internet blacklisting even when that person has never engaged in copyright infringement.
This is a slippery slope for any nation to take when it comes to cyberspace. As we’ve seen in the offline world, when the government decides what’s best for you, you lose your rights as an individual to do just about anything — choosing your own doctor, driving a vehicle with low gas mileage, owning a gun, etc.
For the government who blacklists someone else’s site today, can come up with a “good” reason to blacklist yours tomorrow.






