<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>Internet Lawyer Blog&#187; Federal Communications Commission</title> <atom:link href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/category/federal-communications-commission/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer</link> <description>Internet law attorney blog</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:14:28 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>Julius Genachowski: FCC Chairman Mao Jumps The Shark</title><link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/julius-genachowski-fcc-chairman-net-neutrality/</link> <comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/julius-genachowski-fcc-chairman-net-neutrality/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:55:31 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[CyberCrime]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category> <category><![CDATA[chairman julius genachowski]]></category> <category><![CDATA[chairman of the federal communications commission]]></category> <category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category> <category><![CDATA[fcc chairman]]></category> <category><![CDATA[fcc chairman julius]]></category> <category><![CDATA[fcc chairman mao]]></category> <category><![CDATA[federal communications commission]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Julius Genachowski]]></category> <category><![CDATA[julius genachowski fcc chairman mao jumps the shark]]></category> <category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=2366</guid> <description><![CDATA[Who is FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski? Julius Genachowski is a piece of work. The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), he ignores the U.S. Constitution in his quest to impose unwanted Net Neutrality rules on the Internet. He&#8217;s like every sidekick you see working for Third World dictators trying to control the masses by [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/julius-genachowski-fcc-chairman-net-neutrality/">Julius Genachowski: FCC Chairman Mao Jumps The Shark</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet law attorney blog</a></p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/julius-genachowski-fcc-chairman-net-neutrality/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Net Neutrality Died November 2, 2010</title><link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/net-neutrality/</link> <comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/net-neutrality/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 19:57:49 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Website Attorney]]></category> <category><![CDATA[democrat congressional candidates]]></category> <category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category> <category><![CDATA[federal-communications-commission]]></category> <category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category> <category><![CDATA[net neutrality died november 2 2010]]></category> <category><![CDATA[net-neutrality]]></category> <category><![CDATA[network-neutrality]]></category> <category><![CDATA[regulatory net neutrality]]></category> <category><![CDATA[website-attorney]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=2315</guid> <description><![CDATA[Voters Kill Net Neutrality As a Website attorney, I believe political support for Net Neutrality was just killed in the voting booths nationwide. Here’s why… 95 Democrat congressional candidates signed a pledge in favor of Network Neutrality. Of those 95, every single one appears to have lost election/re-election. Net Neutrality Makes Bad Politics Although there [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/net-neutrality/">Net Neutrality Died November 2, 2010</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet law attorney blog</a></p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/net-neutrality/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Internet Attorney: New Bill Could Kill Your Internet Business</title><link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/internet-attorney-kill-switch/</link> <comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/internet-attorney-kill-switch/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:08:05 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[covered critical infrastructure]]></category> <category><![CDATA[internet attorney]]></category> <category><![CDATA[internet attorney new bill could kill your internet business]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Internet business]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Internet kill switch]]></category> <category><![CDATA[national asset act]]></category> <category><![CDATA[national cyber emergency]]></category> <category><![CDATA[nature of the threat]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Protecting CyberSpace as a National Asset Act]]></category> <category><![CDATA[the president]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=1697</guid> <description><![CDATA[As an Internet attorney and an online entrepreneur, like you, I&#8217;ve got an interest in making sure that the Internet operates relatively smoothly 24/7. When you&#8217;re selling products or services online, you can&#8217;t do business if your site is down. Unfortunately, the mental midgets (Congress) have a pending bill that would let any President declare [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/internet-attorney-kill-switch/">Internet Attorney: New Bill Could Kill Your Internet Business</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet law attorney blog</a></p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/internet-attorney-kill-switch/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Blogging Free Speech and the Fairness Doctrine</title><link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/blogging-free-speech-and-the-fairness-doctrine/</link> <comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/blogging-free-speech-and-the-fairness-doctrine/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:45:20 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category> <category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[blogging free speech and the fairness doctrine]]></category> <category><![CDATA[congress]]></category> <category><![CDATA[fairness doctrine]]></category> <category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category> <category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category> <category><![CDATA[free speech rights]]></category> <category><![CDATA[free-speech]]></category> <category><![CDATA[speech rights]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=275</guid> <description><![CDATA[According to FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell (FCC Commissioner: Return of Fairness Doctrine Could Control Web Content), there&#8217;s a danger that Congress bringing back the Fairness Doctrine would hurt bloggers by hindering their free speech rights. In the current political climate, Democrats in Congress and presumptive Democrat presidential nominee Barack Obama support bringing back the Fairness [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/blogging-free-speech-and-the-fairness-doctrine/">Blogging Free Speech and the Fairness Doctrine</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet law attorney blog</a></p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/blogging-free-speech-and-the-fairness-doctrine/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Comcast ISP File Sharing Traffic Discrimination &#8211; Should the Government Interfere?</title><link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/comcast-isp-file-sharing-traffic-discrimination-should-the-government-interfere/</link> <comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/comcast-isp-file-sharing-traffic-discrimination-should-the-government-interfere/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:30:17 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cell phone company]]></category> <category><![CDATA[comcast isp file sharing traffic discrimination 8211 should the government interfere]]></category> <category><![CDATA[deceptive trade practices]]></category> <category><![CDATA[federal communications commission]]></category> <category><![CDATA[file sharing traffic]]></category> <category><![CDATA[flat monthly rate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[full disclosure]]></category> <category><![CDATA[internet service provider]]></category> <category><![CDATA[internet subscribers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[multi-tiered pricing structures]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2008/01/15/comcast-isp-file-sharing-traffic-discrimination-should-the-government-interfere/</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is investigating charges that Comcast has discriminated against file-sharing traffic on the Internet by restricting the Internet Service Provider&#8217;s subscribers sharing of files using peer-to-peer (P2P) and BitTorrent. The issue really should not be about the ability of an ISP to discriminate between users. I&#8217;m actually a proponent of multi-tiered [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/comcast-isp-file-sharing-traffic-discrimination-should-the-government-interfere/">Comcast ISP File Sharing Traffic Discrimination &#8211; Should the Government Interfere?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet law attorney blog</a></p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/comcast-isp-file-sharing-traffic-discrimination-should-the-government-interfere/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Cell Phone Blocker &#8211; A Good Idea</title><link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/cell-phone-blocker-a-good-idea/</link> <comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/cell-phone-blocker-a-good-idea/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:27:34 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cell Phone]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cell phone blocker]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cell phone blocker 8211 a good idea]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cell phone ring]]></category> <category><![CDATA[federal communications commission]]></category> <category><![CDATA[good idea]]></category> <category><![CDATA[inconsiderate jerks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[long periods of time]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone]]></category> <category><![CDATA[mobile phone companies]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2007/08/14/cell-phone-blocker-a-good-idea/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Tired of inconsiderate jerks talking on their cell phones in restaurants, bathrooms, religious institutions, museums, and other places where you simply want peace and quiet. Ready to throw your popcorn (or a shoe) at the next moron who lets their cell phone ring during a movie? Now there&#8217;s a short-range cell phone blocker on the [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/cell-phone-blocker-a-good-idea/">Cell Phone Blocker &#8211; A Good Idea</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet law attorney blog</a></p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/cell-phone-blocker-a-good-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Federal Communications Commission Says No Cell Phone Use On Planes</title><link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/federal-communications-commission-says-no-cell-phone-use-on-planes/</link> <comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/federal-communications-commission-says-no-cell-phone-use-on-planes/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 21:06:58 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cell Phone]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cell phone use]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cellular phone]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cellular phone calls]]></category> <category><![CDATA[federal aviation administration]]></category> <category><![CDATA[federal communications commission]]></category> <category><![CDATA[federal communications commission says no cell phone use on planes]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone]]></category> <category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category> <category><![CDATA[sufficient technical information]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2007/04/03/federal-communications-commission-says-no-cell-phone-use-on-planes/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Lacking sufficient technical information to show cellular phone calls would be safe in flight, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) erred on the side of caution by announcing today that it would not permit use in-flight. This decision was announced today by the FCC after more than two years of studying the issue. The decision is [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/federal-communications-commission-says-no-cell-phone-use-on-planes/">Federal Communications Commission Says No Cell Phone Use On Planes</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet law attorney blog</a></p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/federal-communications-commission-says-no-cell-phone-use-on-planes/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Google, AT&amp;T, And Net Neutrality Update</title><link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/google-att-and-net-neutrality-update/</link> <comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/google-att-and-net-neutrality-update/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 04:10:08 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category> <category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category> <category><![CDATA[federal communications commission]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google at038t and net neutrality update]]></category> <category><![CDATA[higher rates]]></category> <category><![CDATA[internet neutrality]]></category> <category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category> <category><![CDATA[net neutrality update]]></category> <category><![CDATA[network-neutrality]]></category> <category><![CDATA[priority access]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2007/02/28/google-att-and-net-neutrality-update/</guid> <description><![CDATA[The U.S. Federal Communications Commission placed network neutrality conditions on AT&#038;T&#8217;s acquisition of BellSouth. Using these restrictions as a model, Google is lobbying Congress to pass legislation that provides Internet neutrality with respect to access, thereby preventing ISPs from charging higher rates for priority access to the Net. Hat tip to ContraCostaTimes. Google, AT&#038;T, And [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/google-att-and-net-neutrality-update/">Google, AT&#038;T, And Net Neutrality Update</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet law attorney blog</a></p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/google-att-and-net-neutrality-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/category/federal-communications-commission/feed/ ) in 6.93630 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 8:57 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 9:57 pm UTC -->
