CFPB, Fed officials crack down on military mortgage fraudThe New Marketer’s Adhesive: What Makes It Stick

Google Privacy Policies and You

It appears that Google is in the process of streamlining its privacy policies for its services (YouTube, Gmail, Google Search, Google Analytics etc.) and will use the data it obtains on you as a user of its multiple platforms to deliver content. This includes behavioral targeted advertising.

Some privacy advocates are having a hissy fit because there isn’t an ability to opt-out of how Google will use your data. What they don’t realize is that Google has been collecting this data for years. The new development is that the company will now openly combine the data across platforms in order to more efficiently and effectively deliver content based upon your behavior.

All those benefits of using Google means many users mistakenly believe Google is their BFF.

But Google is a for-profit business. Its purpose is to make money. The company is not your BFF or even an ordinary friend for that matter.

If you’re using Google in your business or personal life, remember that there is no such thing as a free lunch. Someone is paying for Google to exist, for its research and development, and for the content it delivers to you.

Even if you’re not paying money to advertise on Google, you’re paying in other ways, including the behavioral data that’s being tracked. If you’re uncomfortable with that, don’t use Google. No one is putting a gun to your head and requiring you to use Gmail, Google Calendar, or the search engine.

In the brick-and-mortar world, let’s say you own an auto dealership. You offer free maintenance checks to anyone with a car, knowing that the freebie inspections will provide you with a market of potential customers who need to buy a new car or even pay to have repairs done to their existing vehicles.

You also get paid by local gas stations and car washes for placement of advertising in your windows for their businesses. Chances are the driver getting a free maintenance checkup will need to gas up the vehicle or get it washed soon.

Now imagine those taking advantage of your free maintenance checks start making demands on your dealership in order to protect their privacy. They insist that you have no right to recommend repairs, suggest they buy a replacement car, or permit advertising by local gas stations and car washes.

You would be perfectly within your rights to deny such an obnoxious driver access to your freebie inspections. If the driver didn’t like your terms, he could get his inspections somewhere else.

The same thing can be said about Google. If you don’t like Google’s privacy policies, find an alternative service provider. Let the market determine whether Google is making the right decision instead of demanding that Google change its business model in order to accommodate those who want to leech without bringing anything to the table.

What if Google changes its privacy policies after collecting your data? There’s where potential legal liability comes into play. If Google collects your data under one policy, then reneges on it, the company may face private lawsuits by users and get hit by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for such practices.

As a final note, remember that Google is not your BFF. In fact, Google (like other companies) is your potential competitor. If you’re making money online, you should assume that any data you provide Google can and will be used by the company to determine whether or not it wants to enter your niche either directly or through venture capital investing in one of your competitors.

iWorks Jeremy Johnson: More Internet Fraud Criminal Charges Coming

Someone forgot to tell iWorks Jeremy Johnson that when you’re already in a hole, stop digging your way to China.

Johnson stands accused of Internet fraud at I Works Inc. by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Specifically, Johnson allegedly raked in hundreds of millions of dollars in fraudulent online credit card charges from consumers.

If there weren’t victims, the story would be amusing. However, when you think of how many people had hundreds of dollars of unauthorized charges put on their credit cards, it isn’t funny at all. Even where Visa or Mastercard waived the fraudulent charges and ate the losses, those losses get passed along to everyone else through higher credit card interest rates and merchant transaction fees.

To fight back, Jeremy Johnson set up a “watchdog” site to attack the FTC for unjustly going after him for Internet fraud. If even half of what the FTC has charged Johnson with is true, then that’s like Bernie Madoff setting up an anti-SEC site to attack the agency for going after him for bilking billions from investors in a Ponzi scheme.

What about the new Internet fraud charges? The federal government plans to file at least a 50-count new indictment against iWorks Jeremy Johnson because of the alleged Internet fraud. With “his” assets frozen, don’t expect him to put up much of a fight.

As for his victims, there’s little likelihood they will get justice. Perhaps one day the FTC will crack down on the Jeremy Johnson wannabes who currently fly under the radar because the dollar figures involved in their Internet fraud deals are less.

7 Internet Law Predictions for 2012

1. Hollywood Retreats

The entertainment industry thought it had bought enough politicians, plus foolish support by GoDaddy (now retracted), to ram through SOPA/PIPA legislation. Pretending to be about property rights, this horrible legislation would cripple ecommerce while allowing politicians in power to crush free speech online.

Now that Google, Amazon, Facebook, etc. are fighting back, together with civil rights groups and social media, it looks like Hollywood will retrench and regroup until after the November 2012 elections. This battle isn’t over by a long shot. Look for the entertainment industry to try one last shot to push through SOPA/PIPA when Congress critters return to D.C. More lipstick will be put on this legislative pig and it will come back in 2013 under a different name (Protect the Children Act, Save the Puppies Act, Don’t Starve Grandma Act, etc.) designed to create more sympathy.

Let’s hope large ecommerce sites continue to fight and GoDaddy has learned its lesson.

2. Privacy Changes

As Congress deadlocks on Internet privacy legislation, look for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to move forward with additional regulatory protection for children. Either in 2012 or the following year, look for bans or severe restrictions on GPS tracking of children by smart phone apps.

In the meantime, the private sector will come up with additional ways to both protect and circumvent Internet privacy. Whatever comes out of Washington will be obsolete before it becomes law.

3. New Biz Opp Disclosure Requirements Ignored

Effective March 1, 2012, there are new FTC biz opp/work-at-home disclosure requirements. Expect most Internet marketers to ignore this requirement. Some will make disclosures that contain misleading information designed to fool consumers. Few will get caught. The FTC will grab some headlines by suing and confiscating assets of a couple of the really bad apples.

4. Internet Sales Taxes Move Forward

The Federal “main street fairness” Internet sales tax legislation will have the support of both Wal-Mart and Amazon. Expect crony capitalists at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to jump on the bandwagon.

Broke states (California, Illinois, etc.) will push heavily for a federal Internet sales tax on the mistaken assumption they will receive a chunk of the tax money from D.C.

The primary advantage that small business website owners have is that the November 2012 elections provide no incentive for the Republican House and the Democrat Senate to cooperate on agreeing to the time of day or anything else. Plus, there seem to be few Republicans in either house that want to face their constituents to defend imposing a new tax in the middle of an economic recession.

5. Want to bet?

It looks like the U.S. Department of Justice is rethinking its use of a 1961 law to arrest and prosecute the owners of Internet gambling sites. Expect broke state governments to push heavily for legalization of intra-state Internet gambling. In other words, these state governments are going to want the federal government to permit gambling sites to be licensed on a state-by-state basis for gambling only by residents within the one state where each site is licensed.

It remains to be seen whether traditional offline gambling interests will support or oppose such plans. Some of the major U.S. casino companies are already investing in joint ventures with European gambling sites with the expectation of rolling out U.S.-based sites once they become legal.

6. Denial of Service

In the interest of “homeland security,” the U.S. government will continue to arbitrarily shut down websites without affording due process in court. There will not be a backlash until the government overreaches and shuts down a social media website that has political backers on Capitol Hill willing to subpoena and grill those involved.

7. Icann of .Coke

The FTC will continue to pressure Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) about the foolish decision to sell .brands generic top level domain extensions for six figures. If ICANN proceeds, expect a wave of lawsuits to swamp the courts as Competitor A buys the .CompetitorB extension to steal traffic away from Competitor B.

…Wishing you the best in the coming year. Let’s hope the politicians don’t muck up ecommerce for small business owners. Congress doesn’t understand the Internet so it should just stay on the sidelines instead of ruining it for the rest of us.

 

CFPB, Fed officials crack down on military mortgage fraudThe New Marketer’s Adhesive: What Makes It Stick

Free! Get Internet legal and marketing updates plus 3 chapters of the #1 Internet legal protection book for business website owners. Over 40 pages packed with strategies you can use to protect yourself without a lawyer.