<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Internet Lawyer Blog &#187; Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/category/privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer</link>
	<description>Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 19:54:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Website Privacy Policy: Time Waster?</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/website-privacy-policy-time-waster/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/website-privacy-policy-time-waster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 15:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[important legal rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time waster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website privacy policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website privacy policy time waster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website-privacy-policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=3890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you know it would take you about a month to read all of the privacy policies for the websites you will visit in 2012? Frankly, that’s ridiculous…and one of the reasons why some people don’t read website privacy policies. However, you’re often giving up important legal rights under these privacy policies. Many talk about [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/website-privacy-policy-time-waster/">Website Privacy Policy: Time Waster?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/website-privacy-policy-time-waster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CISPA: Just say no to the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/cispa-cyber-intelligence-sharing-and-protection-act/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/cispa-cyber-intelligence-sharing-and-protection-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CISPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cispa just say no to the cyber intelligence sharing and protection act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber intelligence sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber threat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber threat information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber threat intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security act of 1947]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=3845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sponsoring the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011 (CISPA) Congressman Mike Rogers (R-Michigan) is competing to see if he is more evil than SOPA sponsor Lamar Smith (R &#8211; Texas). The bill&#8217;s stated purpose is&#8230; [t]oprovide for the sharing of certain cyber threat intelligence and cyber threat information between the intelligence community and [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/cispa-cyber-intelligence-sharing-and-protection-act/">CISPA: Just say no to the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/cispa-cyber-intelligence-sharing-and-protection-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC Issues Privacy Best Practices Report</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/ftc-issues-privacy-best-practices-report/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/ftc-issues-privacy-best-practices-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc issues privacy best practices report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sledgehammer 10 times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=3825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) weighed in with a privacy “best practices” report. 112 pages that you might find helpful or at least “cure” insomnia. In a nutshell… Creating a “framework” with “principles”, the FTC seems to be punting on the issue of privacy except where there are really outrageous deceptive acts. Why? * [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/ftc-issues-privacy-best-practices-report/">FTC Issues Privacy Best Practices Report</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/ftc-issues-privacy-best-practices-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet privacy bill of rights is BS</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/internet-privacy-bill-of-rights-is-bs/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/internet-privacy-bill-of-rights-is-bs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill of rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet privacy bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet privacy bill of rights is bs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet privacy whiners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legitimate online privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy bill of rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=3741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Internet privacy whiners are like the Occupy Wall Street idiots. They want companies to invest billions developing products and services to make their lives better. However, they don&#8217;t want to pay for any of it. The coin of the cyber realm is often your personal information in exchange for what&#8217;s offered by Google, Facebook, and [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/internet-privacy-bill-of-rights-is-bs/">Internet privacy bill of rights is BS</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/internet-privacy-bill-of-rights-is-bs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Privacy Policy Alert</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/privacy-policy-alert/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/privacy-policy-alert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california privacy law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile app developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy law requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy policy alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website-privacy-policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=3735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick heads up to let you know that California’s Attorney General has forced some of the big companies (Apple, Amazon, Google, HP, etc.) into requiring mobile app developers to have privacy policies for their apps. This was based on a California privacy law requirement. The state’s stance seems to be that if you’ve [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/privacy-policy-alert/">Privacy Policy Alert</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/privacy-policy-alert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>International Telecommunication Union and Internet Secession</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/international-telecommunication-union-and-internet-secession/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/international-telecommunication-union-and-internet-secession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Sales Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global regulatory framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international telecommunication union and internet secession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international-telecommunication-union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet secession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet-taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online freedom goodbye]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=3721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hate Internet censorship? What about Internet taxes and regulation? As noted by Robert McDowell in The U.N. Threat to Internet Freedom, if the bureaucrats at the United Nations have their way, you&#8217;ll be getting a lot more of all three under  the auspices of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Think of the inefficiency of the [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/international-telecommunication-union-and-internet-secession/">International Telecommunication Union and Internet Secession</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/international-telecommunication-union-and-internet-secession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google, Safari, and Internet Privacy</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/google-safari-internet-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/google-safari-internet-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple highlights problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google safari and internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet privacy row]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online privacy issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari blocks websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=3715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As noted by David Moth in Google&#8217;s Internet privacy row with Apple highlights problems with EU cookie laws, &#8220;Safari blocks websites from using cookies without user consent, but Google’s code circumvented this by making the browser think that the user was interacting with the web page by filling out a form.&#8221; Internet privacy related laws [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/google-safari-internet-privacy/">Google, Safari, and Internet Privacy</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/google-safari-internet-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Privacy Policies and You</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/google-privacy-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/google-privacy-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavioral targeted advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavioral targeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google analytics etc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google privacy policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google privacy policies and you]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=3707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears that Google is in the process of streamlining its privacy policies for its services (YouTube, Gmail, Google Search, Google Analytics etc.) and will use the data it obtains on you as a user of its multiple platforms to deliver content. This includes behavioral targeted advertising. Some privacy advocates are having a hissy fit [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/google-privacy-policy/">Google Privacy Policies and You</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/google-privacy-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 Internet Law Predictions for 2012</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2012-internet-law-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2012-internet-law-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 02:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Sales Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 internet law predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 internet privacy predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet sales tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet sales taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[main street fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=3684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Hollywood Retreats The entertainment industry thought it had bought enough politicians, plus foolish support by GoDaddy (now retracted), to ram through SOPA/PIPA legislation. Pretending to be about property rights, this horrible legislation would cripple ecommerce while allowing politicians in power to crush free speech online. Now that Google, Amazon, Facebook, etc. are fighting back, [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2012-internet-law-predictions/">7 Internet Law Predictions for 2012</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2012-internet-law-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liability Risks For Businesses That Provide Free Wi-Fi to Customers</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/internet-privacy-wifi/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/internet-privacy-wifi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Laws Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free internet access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet service provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet service providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet-lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liability risks for businesses that provide free wifi to customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motion picture association of america]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording industry association of america]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wi fi privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wifi privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=3107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What have companies done to increase business? In an increasingly online world, many companies throughout the country have enticed customers into doing business by offering free internet access. For example, coffee shops, automotive repair centers, and restaurants have all considered it economically advantageous to offer customers access to the internet as a means of getting [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/internet-privacy-wifi/">Liability Risks For Businesses That Provide Free Wi-Fi to Customers</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/internet-privacy-wifi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Website Privacy Principles</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/googles-website-privacy-principles/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/googles-website-privacy-principles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Laws Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concerned website privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright-infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google8217s website privacy principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website privacy information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website privacy principles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=3117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why did Google post its website privacy principles online? In a time where governments, privacy watch groups, and concerned individuals worry about the capability large internet companies have to store information about their users, Google has posted its website privacy principles online. Specific concerns have existed concerning Google’s policy of not deleting any of the [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/googles-website-privacy-principles/">Google&#8217;s Website Privacy Principles</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/googles-website-privacy-principles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Privacy and Facebook Facial Recognition Software</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/internet-privacy-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/internet-privacy-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 10:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Laws Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enormous privacy risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook facial recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facial recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facial recognition software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facial recognition technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet privacy and facebook facial recognition software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet-lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=3161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does facial recognition software do? A Carnegie Mellon University researcher recently proved the extent to which a person’s facial features alone can access information about that person. Assembling a database of around 25,000 pictures acquired by Facebook, this researcher was able to identify individuals walking past him on a university campus with an astounding [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/internet-privacy-facebook/">Internet Privacy and Facebook Facial Recognition Software</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/internet-privacy-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Cartoons Cyberstalking, Internet Defamation, or Free Speech?</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/internet-cartoons-cyberstalking/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/internet-cartoons-cyberstalking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 10:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Laws Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberCrime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[are cartoons cyberstalking internet defamation or free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberstalking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free-speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renton police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renton police department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renton washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=3153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Internet cartoons equal cyberstalking? The Renton, WA police department sought to prosecute an internet user who posted an insulting video about the police department under the screen name Mr. Fiddlesticks. The alleged crime? Cyberstalking. To assist them in their pursuit of the internet user, the Renton police department recently obtained a search warrant that orders [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/internet-cartoons-cyberstalking/">Are Cartoons Cyberstalking, Internet Defamation, or Free Speech?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/internet-cartoons-cyberstalking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Groupon Privacy Policy Modified</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/groupon-privacy-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/groupon-privacy-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Laws Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discount entertainment company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groupon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groupon privacy policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groupon privacy policy modified]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet privacy policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy policy change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy policy modifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website-privacy-policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=3123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What Groupon privacy policy changes were made? The Groupon privacy policy was recently modified. The company sent an email to each of its 83 million subscribers describing a change in regard to this privacy policy. Specifically, the new change explains that under the modified Groupon privacy policy, the company will begin collecting and making use [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/groupon-privacy-policy/">Groupon Privacy Policy Modified</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/groupon-privacy-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Plus Privacy Policy: What You Should Know</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/google-plus-privacy-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/google-plus-privacy-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google mobile privacy policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google plus one button privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google plus privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google plus privacy policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google plus privacy policy what you should know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google+ privacy policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=3047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Plus Privacy Because I’m an Internet lawyer, I decided to test out the new Google Plus Privacy. You can click the link in the prior sentence to see my Google+ profile as an example. After the company’s privacy fiasco with Buzz last year, the new Google+ goes out of its way to explain privacy [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/google-plus-privacy-policy/">Google Plus Privacy Policy: What You Should Know</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/google-plus-privacy-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada Lawful Access Bill and Internet Spying</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/canada-lawful-access-bill-internet-spying/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/canada-lawful-access-bill-internet-spying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberCrime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canada lawful access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canada lawful access bill and internet spying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet service provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet service providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet spying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawful access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawful access bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=3037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does the Canada Lawful Access bill propose to do? Canada’s Conservative political party asserted that it wants to pass a Canada Lawful Access bill, which it claims will crack down on crime. For almost 10 years, there have been failed attempts to pass such a bill but this time there&#8217;s a good chance of [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/canada-lawful-access-bill-internet-spying/">Canada Lawful Access Bill and Internet Spying</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/canada-lawful-access-bill-internet-spying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outted by Twitter</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/twitter-privacy-identity/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/twitter-privacy-identity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 21:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymous twitter accounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outted by twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south tyneside councillor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter user]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=2855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is significant to your Internet attorney and your business too. Twitter has just revealed the identity of a Twitter user, including his personal contact information. Here’s what happened… A local British government sued in California. Twitter caved and gave out the Tweeter’s name and contact information. Twitter  “passed the name, email address and telephone [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/twitter-privacy-identity/">Outted by Twitter</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/twitter-privacy-identity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good privacy law news for website owners</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/privacy-law-news-website-owners/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/privacy-law-news-website-owners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 22:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe-flash-cookies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class-action privacy lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good privacy law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good privacy law news for website owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet-lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tracking-cookies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=2815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s something your Internet lawyer probably doesn’t see every day. A California federal judge threw out of court a class-action privacy lawsuit filed against an ad network. Why was the case tossed? The judge couldn’t see how the plaintiffs could show they were harmed by the Adobe Flash tracking cookies installed on their computers. To [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/privacy-law-news-website-owners/">Good privacy law news for website owners</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/privacy-law-news-website-owners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court says no to Twitter social media secrets</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/twitter-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/twitter-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court says no to twitter social media secrets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media secrets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter account]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter account info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter lacks privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=2713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As an Internet attorney, I don’t find it surprising that courts are giving the government access to personal information associated with social media accounts like Twitter and Facebook. This means lawyers are probably going to get their hands on the same type of information in any lawsuits against you. Here’s the latest example… The U.S. [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/twitter-social-media/">Court says no to Twitter social media secrets</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/twitter-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do Not Track Me Online Act of 2011: Jackie Speier</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/do-not-track-me-online-act-of-2011-jackie-speier/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/do-not-track-me-online-act-of-2011-jackie-speier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[do not track me online act of 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[do not track me online act of 2011 jackie speier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[do-not-track]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal trade commmission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hr 654]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet-lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jackie speier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=2635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Firing another shot in the do-not-track Internet privacy battle, Congresswoman Jackie Speier (D-CA) introduced the Do Not Track Me Online Act of 2011. The decision by Microsoft, Mozilla, and Google to add do-not-track options to their respective Explorer, Firefox, and Chrome web browsers was never going to be enough for Congress. I&#8217;ve included the text [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/do-not-track-me-online-act-of-2011-jackie-speier/">Do Not Track Me Online Act of 2011: Jackie Speier</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/do-not-track-me-online-act-of-2011-jackie-speier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: mikeyounglaw.com @ 2012-05-23 12:00:59 -->
