<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Internet Lawyer Blog &#187; RIAA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/category/riaa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer</link>
	<description>Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 19:54:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>7 Internet Law Predictions for 2012</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2012-internet-law-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2012-internet-law-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 02:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Sales Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 internet law predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 internet privacy predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet sales tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet sales taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[main street fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=3684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Hollywood Retreats The entertainment industry thought it had bought enough politicians, plus foolish support by GoDaddy (now retracted), to ram through SOPA/PIPA legislation. Pretending to be about property rights, this horrible legislation would cripple ecommerce while allowing politicians in power to crush free speech online. Now that Google, Amazon, Facebook, etc. are fighting back, [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2012-internet-law-predictions/">7 Internet Law Predictions for 2012</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2012-internet-law-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox Columnist Fired for Promoting Wolverine Piracy</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/fox-columnist-fired-for-promoting-wolverine-piracy/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/fox-columnist-fired-for-promoting-wolverine-piracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 11:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberCrime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20th century fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox columnist fired for promoting wolverine piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox news corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music piracy hypocrites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikki finke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolverine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x-men origins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fox News Corp. isn&#8217;t amused that its freelance columnist, Roger Friedman, has watched a pirated version of 20th Century Fox&#8217;s X-Men Origins: Wolverine and apparently promoted such piracy in a column he posted on Fox News&#8217; website. According to Nikki Finke, Friedman has apparently been canned and his column deleted. This just reinforces the futility [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/fox-columnist-fired-for-promoting-wolverine-piracy/">Fox Columnist Fired for Promoting Wolverine Piracy</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/fox-columnist-fired-for-promoting-wolverine-piracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright Infringement Damages &#8211; Are They Constitutional?</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-infringement-damages-are-they-constitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-infringement-damages-are-they-constitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement damages 8211 are they constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright-damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright-infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denise-barker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elektra-entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infringement-damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[umg-recordings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virgin-records]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/?p=273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an unusual copyright infringement case, a defendant (Denise Barker) admits that she engaged in downloading copyrighted materials using Kazaa&#8217;s peer-to-peer (P2P) network. What makes this case unique is that the defendant is challenging the constitutionality of the damages music companies are trying to extract from her in the lawsuit. As I&#8217;ve discussed in this [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-infringement-damages-are-they-constitutional/">Copyright Infringement Damages &#8211; Are They Constitutional?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-infringement-damages-are-they-constitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OiNK Music Piracy Site Shut Down</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/oink-music-piracy/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/oink-music-piracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[24-year-old englishman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law enforcement authorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music piracy site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music piracy sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music piracy website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oink music piracy site shut down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirate sites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2007/10/23/oink-music-piracy-site-shut-down/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His Amsterdam servers seized, a 24-year-old Englishman was arrested for operating the music piracy website OiNK. This is just the latest example of international cooperation between law enforcement authorities to crack down on pirate sites. For now, that&#8217;s like trying to empty the ocean using a bucket with a hole in it. All it does [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/oink-music-piracy/">OiNK Music Piracy Site Shut Down</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/oink-music-piracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Music Piracy &#8211; Even the Experts Get it Wrong</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/music-piracy-even-the-experts-get-it-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/music-piracy-even-the-experts-get-it-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad marketing ploy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceo eric garland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement losses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low quality bitrate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music piracy 8211 even the experts get it wrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music piracy hypocrites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2007/10/17/music-piracy-even-the-experts-get-it-wrong/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andy Greenberg has an article in Forbes that cites intellectual property (IP) experts whining about the peer-to-peer (p2p) piracy of Radiohead&#8217;s latest album. Because Radiohead let fans name their own price, but pirates still downloaded the music on bittorrent instead, the mistaken assumption is that the piracy hurt the distribution model used by Radiohead. You [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/music-piracy-even-the-experts-get-it-wrong/">Music Piracy &#8211; Even the Experts Get it Wrong</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/music-piracy-even-the-experts-get-it-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Radiohead &#8211; Pay What You Want For Their New Album</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/radiohead-pay-what-you-want-for-their-new-album/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/radiohead-pay-what-you-want-for-their-new-album/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[album releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement watchdogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright-infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new album]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiohead 8211 pay what you want for their new album]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2007/10/01/radiohead-pay-what-you-want-for-their-new-album/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beginning October 10th, you can download Radiohead&#8217;s latest album (&#8220;In Rainbows&#8221;) and pay what you want for it. The U.K. band is testing the waters in the right direction for breaking the stranglehold the record labels have on music distribution. Consider this a thumb in the eye of RIAA and the entertainment industry music piracy [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/radiohead-pay-what-you-want-for-their-new-album/">Radiohead &#8211; Pay What You Want For Their New Album</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/radiohead-pay-what-you-want-for-their-new-album/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright Infringement &#8211; Will DMCA Coupon Case Be Dismissed?</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-infringement-will-dmca-coupon-case-be-dismissed/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-infringement-will-dmca-coupon-case-be-dismissed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement 8211 will dmca coupon case be dismissed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright-infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coupon case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Millennium Copyright Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infringement case]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2007/09/24/copyright-infringement-will-dmca-coupon-case-be-dismissed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Stottlemire has just struck back in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) infringement case filed against him by Coupons, Inc. (coupons.com). Stottlemire is seeking dismissal of the case for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted or summary judgment in the alternative. He&#8217;s also seeking Rule 11 sanctions against the [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-infringement-will-dmca-coupon-case-be-dismissed/">Copyright Infringement &#8211; Will DMCA Coupon Case Be Dismissed?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-infringement-will-dmca-coupon-case-be-dismissed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media Defender &#8211; Anti-Piracy Group Caught Setting Up Fake Video Download Site</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/media-defender-anti-piracy-group-caught-setting-up-fake-video-download-site/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/media-defender-anti-piracy-group-caught-setting-up-fake-video-download-site/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 03:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-piracy group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fake video download]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal media defender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media defender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media defender 8211 antipiracy group caught setting up fake video download site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2007/09/16/media-defender-anti-piracy-group-caught-setting-up-fake-video-download-site/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to TorrentFreak, Media Defender set up a fake video download site to entrap BitTorrent and other peer-to-peer (P2P) users as part of MediaDefender&#8217;s anti-piracy efforts. The report claims that internal Media Defender e-mails that have become public provide the details of the scheme to have people upload copyrighted content to miivi.com and then nail [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/media-defender-anti-piracy-group-caught-setting-up-fake-video-download-site/">Media Defender &#8211; Anti-Piracy Group Caught Setting Up Fake Video Download Site</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/media-defender-anti-piracy-group-caught-setting-up-fake-video-download-site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Porn Industry Joins Hollywood in Attacking BitTorrent</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/porn-industry-joins-hollywood-in-attacking-bittorrent/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/porn-industry-joins-hollywood-in-attacking-bittorrent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 04:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright-infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Millennium Copyright Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca dog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music piracy hypocrites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porn industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porn industry joins hollywood in attacking bittorrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porn video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video makers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2007/09/11/porn-industry-joins-hollywood-in-attacking-bittorrent/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tired of losing four percent of their profits to piracy, porn video makers are plotting legal attacks against BitTorrent for copyright infringement. This puts pornographers in the same bed as MPAA and RIAA. Fitting but funny when you consider how many adult films have ripped their titles and loosely borrowed their &#8216;plots&#8217; from mainstream PG [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/porn-industry-joins-hollywood-in-attacking-bittorrent/">Porn Industry Joins Hollywood in Attacking BitTorrent</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/porn-industry-joins-hollywood-in-attacking-bittorrent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DMCA Infringement By Deleting Files On Your Computer?</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/dmca-infringement-by-deleting-files-on-your-computer/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/dmca-infringement-by-deleting-files-on-your-computer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[better coupon distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deleting files]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Millennium Copyright Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca infringement by deleting files on your computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[room temperature iq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temperature iq politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2007/08/22/dmca-infringement-by-deleting-files-on-your-computer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s yet another example of why room temperature IQ politicians have no business prostituting themselves for campaign contributions from RIAA, MPAA, and others in the entertainment industry. An Internet entrepreneur, John Stottlemire, found a way to delete certain files and registry keys on one&#8217;s computer so that multiple copies of coupons could be printed from [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/dmca-infringement-by-deleting-files-on-your-computer/">DMCA Infringement By Deleting Files On Your Computer?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/dmca-infringement-by-deleting-files-on-your-computer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hollywood Attacks Web Video Pirates</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/hollywood-attacks-web-video-pirates/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/hollywood-attacks-web-video-pirates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 05:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood attacks web video pirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video pirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste of time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2007/07/10/hollywood-attacks-web-video-pirates/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copying RIAA&#8217;s tactics in the music industry, the MPAA has filed a lawsuit to stop online video piracy. Like RIAA, the MPAA is doomed to fail. Copyright laws are old, obsolete, and can&#8217;t keep pace with modern technology. However, be sure to protect your business and your personal assets by not putting yourself in a [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/hollywood-attacks-web-video-pirates/">Hollywood Attacks Web Video Pirates</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/hollywood-attacks-web-video-pirates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright Alliance &#8211; Beware of it</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-alliance-beware-of-it/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-alliance-beware-of-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 13:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-entrepreneur effort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[association of american publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright alliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright alliance 8211 beware of it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright-infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motion picture association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property protection act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording industry association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viacom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2007/05/24/copyright-alliance-beware-of-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following up on what I wrote about the Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2007&#8230;a bill designed to make it easy for virtually anyone to be convicted of copyright infringement, or even attempted infringement, by shifting the burden from the accuser to you. The big money is lining up behind the bill with the formation of [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-alliance-beware-of-it/">Copyright Alliance &#8211; Beware of it</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-alliance-beware-of-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon Competes With Apple iTunes &#8211; Sells DRM-Free Song MP3s</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/amazon-competes-with-apple-itunes-sells-drm-free-song-mp3s/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/amazon-competes-with-apple-itunes-sells-drm-free-song-mp3s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 13:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aline van duyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon competes with apple itunes 8211 sells drmfree song mp3s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple itunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright-infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital rights management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drm-free song mp3s]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2007/05/17/amazon-competes-with-apple-itunes-sells-drm-free-song-mp3s/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazon.com has announced that it is taking on Apple iTunes by selling mp3s without the digital rights management (DRM) designed to prevent you from transferring mp3s freely between devices. Kudos to Amazon for acknowledging what consumers want and giving it to them. Apple is too much in bed with RIAA on copyright infringement issues to [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/amazon-competes-with-apple-itunes-sells-drm-free-song-mp3s/">Amazon Competes With Apple iTunes &#8211; Sells DRM-Free Song MP3s</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/amazon-competes-with-apple-itunes-sells-drm-free-song-mp3s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright Thought Crime and the Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2007</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-thought-crime-and-the-intellectual-property-protection-act-of-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-thought-crime-and-the-intellectual-property-protection-act-of-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 17:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright thought crime and the intellectual property protection act of 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright-infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property protection act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protection act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2007/05/15/copyright-thought-crime-and-the-intellectual-property-protection-act-of-2007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bush administration is supporting a new intellectual property (IP) law that should be opposed by any sane individual. Of course, that excludes most politicians who are lining their pockets with money from the entertainment industry. What is going on? The White House is supporting the Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2007&#8230;a horrendous bill that [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-thought-crime-and-the-intellectual-property-protection-act-of-2007/">Copyright Thought Crime and the Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2007</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-thought-crime-and-the-intellectual-property-protection-act-of-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 06:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[09 f9 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[09 f9 11 02]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d8 41 56]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prior blog post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2007/05/02/09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you don&#8217;t know what these numbers mean, Google them. If you do know what these numbers mean and object to them being posted, see the First Amendment. Hint: It trumps the DMCA. If you want to know why the numbers were posted, check out this prior blog post. 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0/">09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress Debates Proposed Anti-Spyware Bill</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/congress-debates-proposed-anti-spyware-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/congress-debates-proposed-anti-spyware-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spyware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biggest proponents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill becomes law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress debates proposed antispyware bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malicious spyware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpaa advocates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spy act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2007/03/22/congress-debates-proposed-anti-spyware-bill/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Spy Act (Securely Protect Yourself Against Cyber Trespass) is being debated in the U.S. House of Representatives. How will this affect your business? Hopefully not at all. But here&#8217;s the danger. If some form of this bill becomes law, Congress has a propensity to screw things up when it comes to the Internet because, [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/congress-debates-proposed-anti-spyware-bill/">Congress Debates Proposed Anti-Spyware Bill</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/congress-debates-proposed-anti-spyware-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) Hits Small Webcasters</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-royalty-board-crb-hits-small-webcasters/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-royalty-board-crb-hits-small-webcasters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright royalty board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright royalty board crb hits small webcasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent music artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jason fry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licensed music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riaa shakedown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2007/03/15/copyright-royalty-board-crb-hits-small-webcasters/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CRB has dramatically hiked the royalty rates for licensed music broadcast on the Internet. If you&#8217;re using, or considering using, such music as part of your business, check out the new rates. Fortunately, there are independent music artists who can provide you with quality alternatives to this RIAA shakedown. Hat tip to Reuters and [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-royalty-board-crb-hits-small-webcasters/">Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) Hits Small Webcasters</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-royalty-board-crb-hits-small-webcasters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Music Piracy: RIAA Ordered To Pay Attorney Fees</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/music-piracy-riaa/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/music-piracy-riaa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ars technica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright-infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd-dvd encryptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music piracy hypocrites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music piracy riaa ordered to pay attorney fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music piracy story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2007/02/15/riaa-ordered-to-pay-attorney-fees/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a music piracy story that brings a smile to my lips, RIAA must pay the attorney fees of a woman it sued for copyright infringement. Remember, RIAA is funded by a bunch of music piracy hypocrites. They&#8217;ll sue you and I but give a free pass to their own. Hat tip to Ars Technica. [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/music-piracy-riaa/">Music Piracy: RIAA Ordered To Pay Attorney Fees</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/music-piracy-riaa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright Infringement, Spin, and DMCA Protection For You</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-infringement-spin-and-dmca-protection-for-you/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-infringement-spin-and-dmca-protection-for-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 11:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement spin and dmca protection for you]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright-infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Millennium Copyright Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viacom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2007/02/07/copyright-infringement-spin-and-dmca-protection-for-you/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does Google&#8217;s New Toy Really Expect Anyone To Believe This? &#8220;We take copyright issues very seriously.&#8221; - YouTube spokesman. No. Just taking Viacom&#8217;s demand that 100,000 video clips be removed for infringement very seriously. Viacom has the deep pockets to take on Google in court. If you find your copyrighted work on YouTube, use the [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-infringement-spin-and-dmca-protection-for-you/">Copyright Infringement, Spin, and DMCA Protection For You</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/copyright-infringement-spin-and-dmca-protection-for-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Music Piracy: Companies Rocked In Anti-Piracy Battles</title>
		<link>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/music-piracy-2/</link>
		<comments>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/music-piracy-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-piracy battles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceo bob wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music piracy companies rocked in antipiracy battles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music piracy software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony bmg music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violating antitrust laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warner Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/2007/01/31/music-companies-rocked-in-anti-piracy-battles/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With no viable defense, Sony BMG Music just settled FTC claims that requires it to pay consumers up to $150 each for damages caused by anti- music piracy software its CDs installed on computers. In another case, a 16-year-old boy accused of music piracy when he was as young as 11, has just filed counter-claims [...]<p><a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/music-piracy-2/">Music Piracy: Companies Rocked In Anti-Piracy Battles</a> is a post from: <a href="http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer">Internet Lawyer Blog - Internet attorney blog discussing cyber law</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mikeyounglaw.com/internet-lawyer/music-piracy-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: mikeyounglaw.com @ 2012-05-23 12:03:19 -->
