Voluntary Internet Privacy Proposal Is A Day Late And A Dollar ShortMore Privacy, or More ExcusesNTIA: Putting the Administration’s Privacy Blueprint into PracticeFrancoise Gilbert – Privacy – Security – Cloud ComputingThe Big 5 ExperimentA Politecho Poster SessionGeek-Squared: Big Brother and Internet Privacy Meet the DaleksWhat is the best web browser or software for Internet privacyWhat Has Happened to AmericaAnith Gopal

Internet privacy bill of rights is BS

Internet privacy whiners are like the Occupy Wall Street idiots.

They want companies to invest billions developing products and services to make their lives better.
However, they don’t want to pay for any of it.

The coin of the cyber realm is often your personal information in exchange for what’s offered by Google, Facebook, and countless other sites.

If you don’t like the cost, find another supplier instead of demanding the government force companies to give you something for nothing online.

“Internet privacy” should not be a term used to extort freebies that cost companies a lot to develop in the first place.

Legitimate online privacy concerns do exist. However, those primarily involve sites that collect your data and deceive you about the type of information being collected and what’s being done with the data.

Share

Are Social Media Employment Background Checks Legal?

social media employment background checks

What do you think of social media employment background checks?

FTC and Social Media Employment Background Checks

When it comes to social media employment background checks, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has indicated that it plans to hold employers gaining information about potential employees over the internet subject to the same accountability as employers who obtain information about prospective employees in more traditional ways.

This means, among other laws and regulations, that social media employment background checks must comply with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).

As the consumer protection branch of the federal government, the FTC works in part to protect the privacy and reputation value inherent in people’s names. This protection has extended to the FTC enforcing regulations whereby employers must do diligent research into the accuracy of data provided to them about potential future employees.

Traditionally, this research extended to ensuring the accuracy of official reports, like criminal history and previous employment statistics, but recent guidance by the Federal Trade Commission indicates that the FTC is looking at how employers make use of information on the internet.

Why Social Media Employment Background Checks Are Popular

Some companies make money by researching the backgrounds of individuals, and then selling the results of social media employment background checks to prospective employers who may hire those individuals. Employers value this information and are willing to pay money to know how successful potential employees might be with their company. Much of the information sold to employers by information gathering companies comes from internet websites such as Facebook, Linkedin, MySpace, and Twitter.

While often employers can learn a good deal about a job applicant by viewing his or her posts on the Internet, there are concerns about the accuracy of data provided to employers gathered this way. For example, online identity theft could, if undiscovered or not disrupted, cause employers to rely upon false information to reject a prospective employee.

The FTC recognizes this possibility and wants employers and their information providers to take additional steps to ensure that a potential employee is not rejected for a position because online identity theft tainted social media employment background checks.

Social Media Employment Background Checks and Identity Theft

Although FTC conditional approval of social media employment background checks does nothing to stop online pirates from stealing the identity of others, it does encourage employers to make sure information given to them is accurate. Online identity theft may always exist, but now employers know that the FTC may punish them for not verifying data used by them for hiring purposes is reasonably certain to be accurate.

Companies providing data to employers must also take heed of the FTC’s views. The Federal Trade Commission wants these research organizations to ensure that the data they provide to employers will not be used in a way contrary to the law. Responsibility, therefore, on the part of both employers and research firms providing them with the social media employment background checks, will perhaps lead to greater data accuracy albeit at the expense of a prospective employee’s privacy.

Of course, there remains the unresolved issue of whether sites like Facebook will be held liable by the government or in civil lawsuits for damages if they sell false information to firms who use it for social media employment background checks.

Share

Is your Facebook friend wagging the dog?

Internet Attorney Social Media Fraud

Social Media Fraud By The Government?

When I was a young Internet attorney, there was a movie called “Wag the Dog.”

As you can see in the trailer below, in the movie, actor Robert De Niro’s character manipulates the public for the U.S. President by creating a fake war using film footage shot by a Hollywood producer.

The media reports the “war” as if it actually exists, spinning public opinion to support the President. Yet another blurring of the line between art and reality.

YouTube Preview Image

The U.S. government is now apparently about to wag the social media dog in real life.

Here’s how it works…

A government contractor will provide the servers in exchange for almost 3 million bucks. And up to 50 members of the military will each create 10 or so fake (sock puppet) identities to use to manipulate social media conversations for a pro-U.S. slant on things like the “War on Terrorism.”

Who decides what the socket puppets say or who they impersonate? If you’re harmed by interacting with one of these fake identities, chances are your Internet attorney won’t be able to do a thing for you because the government has sovereign immunity.

And where’s the firewall between psychological warfare against jihadists, for example, and using the same sock puppets to astro-turf fake public support for a political cause or even a candidate for election?

This is dangerous territory for any government to dabble in…and more risky if you tried to do the same thing. If you set up sock puppets to manipulate and deceive people online, you could be arrested or sued because of it. Before even considering wagging the social media dog for fun or profit, talk it over with your Internet attorney first.

And be cautious when a Facebook “friend” or a tweet makes a claim about something important to you. Verify before you act.

To your online success!

-Mike the Internet Attorney

Share
Voluntary Internet Privacy Proposal Is A Day Late And A Dollar ShortMore Privacy, or More ExcusesNTIA: Putting the Administration’s Privacy Blueprint into PracticeFrancoise Gilbert – Privacy – Security – Cloud ComputingThe Big 5 ExperimentA Politecho Poster SessionGeek-Squared: Big Brother and Internet Privacy Meet the DaleksWhat is the best web browser or software for Internet privacyWhat Has Happened to AmericaAnith Gopal