iWorks Jeremy Johnson: More Internet Fraud Criminal Charges Coming

Someone forgot to tell iWorks Jeremy Johnson that when you’re already in a hole, stop digging your way to China.

Johnson stands accused of Internet fraud at I Works Inc. by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Specifically, Johnson allegedly raked in hundreds of millions of dollars in fraudulent online credit card charges from consumers.

If there weren’t victims, the story would be amusing. However, when you think of how many people had hundreds of dollars of unauthorized charges put on their credit cards, it isn’t funny at all. Even where Visa or Mastercard waived the fraudulent charges and ate the losses, those losses get passed along to everyone else through higher credit card interest rates and merchant transaction fees.

To fight back, Jeremy Johnson set up a “watchdog” site to attack the FTC for unjustly going after him for Internet fraud. If even half of what the FTC has charged Johnson with is true, then that’s like Bernie Madoff setting up an anti-SEC site to attack the agency for going after him for bilking billions from investors in a Ponzi scheme.

What about the new Internet fraud charges? The federal government plans to file at least a 50-count new indictment against iWorks Jeremy Johnson because of the alleged Internet fraud. With “his” assets frozen, don’t expect him to put up much of a fight.

As for his victims, there’s little likelihood they will get justice. Perhaps one day the FTC will crack down on the Jeremy Johnson wannabes who currently fly under the radar because the dollar figures involved in their Internet fraud deals are less.

Share

Fake Internet Yellow Pages Scam Shut Down

How did a fake internet yellow pages company scam people in the US, Canada, and Australia?

Since 2009, a company based in Palma de Mallorca, Spain has used British and Dutch based corporations to send unsolicited emails to numerous small organization, in the hope of scamming those organizations out of money.

Implicitly pretending affiliation with the Yellow Pages, this company faxed forms to organizations under the pretense of having a preexisting relationship with those organizations. Then, confident with the pseudo-Yellow Page company’s credentials, organizations would reply to the scam company under the assumption that they were simply renewing their Yellow Pages information. What they did not know, however, was that in the fine print the scam company induced the unassuming organizations into registration in a separate online directory, at the rate of $89/month.

What has the FTC done as a result of the scam?

When organizations came to understand their predicament, and that they had entered into agreements with the fraudulent company under false assumptions, the FTC began taking a keen interest in the issue. After repeated instances, the FTC determined that the Mallorca based company indubitably sought to defraud these organizations. Upon that revelation, the FTC persuaded a federal judge to halt all transactions taking place between Americans and the European-based company.

To be sure, the Mallorca-based company did indicate its intent in the small print attached to the information sheets sent out to organizations and individuals. However, given the implicit representation the entire remainder of the fax conveys, many feel that Americans deserve justice. The FTC has recently declared that it desires nothing less than for the Mallorca company to refund all people defrauded by this scheme.

What has the response from other countries been to the scam?

Canada, Australia, and perhaps other countries have felt the effects of the Mallorca-based fraudsters. The Canadian Competition Bureau specifically has worked vigorously with the FTC in the past to stamp out schemes like this one, with the intention of defrauding consumers. In this most recent example, concerning the Mallorca-based organization, the Canadian Competition Bureau joined the FTC by filing suit against this organization which they feel has led to business losses by small businesses and organizations in Canada.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, likewise, has previously brought action against the Mallorca company’s actions done to consumers in Australia. With the help and advice of these organizations, the FTC seeks now to prevent Americans and others in countries, potentially, across the globe, in preventing the Mallorca company from further being able to defraud and deceive unwitting consumers into their scheme.

Share

Jeremy Johnson: iWorks Alleged Internet Con Artist Stuck In Jail

jeremy johnson iworks

Will iWorks Jeremy Johnson remain in jail?

What is Jeremy Johnson accused of having done?

Jeremy Johnson, his company IWorks, and several associates and related entities were sued by the Federal Trade Commission last December.

The FTC suspects that Johnson engaged in using shell companies and false advertisements involving government and private grants. While maintaining his innocence throughout the legal process, Johnson has enjoyed particular media attention due to a degree of fame attached to him. Well known for using his personal helicopters to both rescue individuals lost in the rugged Utah terrain near where he lives, and to fly doctors to Haiti following the earthquake there in 2008, Johnson has awaited trial in jail since June, 2011.

Why has Jeremy Johnson been denied bail?

On June 12, when federal officials arrested Jeremy Johnson in a Phoenix airport, Johnson had on his person $26,400 in cash, and a one way ticket to Costa Rica. Since then, officials have remained reluctant to release Johnson on bail for fear that he might flee the country. Johnson has claimed that the one-way ticket to Costa Rica and the large amount of cash on his person result from favorable currency exchange rates once inside Costa Rica, and from cheaper return deals when booked separately.

Johnson has also claimed that he does not serve as a flight risk because all of his family and friends live around Utah, and that he would not leave them behind to flee to another country. However, this argument and others have not persuaded federal agents to allow Johnson out of jail, even on bail of one million dollars. A federal magistrate as recently as Thursday, August 1 ruled against Johnson leaving jail before trial.

What prevented the federal magistrate from allowing Jeremy Johnson out of jail?

Under subpoena, Las Vegas businessman Chad Elie presented testimony seemingly indicative of Johnson’s ability and potential desire to flee the country. A co-owner of one of Johnson’s businesses, Elie currently is under criminal indictment from a New York federal part for playing an active role in illegally processing gambling payments. Concerning Johnson’s continued incarceration, Elie testified about what he witnessed while riding in one of Johnson’s private helicopter.

Specifically, Elie commented that Jeremy Johnson displayed numerous places against the mountainous Utah background where gold and cash were hidden. Places Johnson hid gold and money included on mountains, and submerged under lakes. Elie’s further claims that Johnson hid the monetary items to have secret stores of cash in case Johnson got involved with federal agents convinced the federal magistrate that Jeremy Johnson should not be allowed to leave federal custody at this time.

Share