How you can avoid Starbucks’ mistake

Internet attorneyAs an Internet Attorney, I know that when you’re putting together joint ventures for your online business, it’s important to consider your long-term interests.

Here’s a costly brick-and-mortar biz example from Starbucks on what not to do.

Several years ago, Starbucks wanted to distribute its coffee in grocery stores and other places beyond its cafes. Because Kraft already had the distribution network in place for its food, Starbucks signed a contract to have Kraft distribute its coffee too.

The mistake?

The contract was designed to last forever without an easy way to get out of it. But times change, people change, and so will your business needs. Plan accordingly.

Now Starbucks is trying to weasel out of the contract. If Kraft can enforce the agreement, Starbucks will end up paying out billions to escape and set up its own distribution network for stores.

No matter how attractive a joint venture deal looks, be sure you put in place the right contract language that lets you walk away when it is profitable to do so. There are at least a half dozen ways that your Internet attorney can help you do this both legally and ethically.

To your online success!

-Mike the Internet Attorney

Facing The Music At Starbucks

Starbucks is launching its own music label and hopes to land Paul McCartney for its first album.

What lessons can be learned from this for your business?

First, it is a matter of distribution. McDonalds is one of the largest toy vendors in the world (via Happy Meals) because of the number of outlets that it has to sell food and merchandise. Wal-Mart is the biggest vendor of DVDs for the same reason. As seen by its success in selling other labels’ CDs, Starbucks has the distribution capabilities.

You probably don’t have as many outlets as a Starbucks, McDonalds, or a Wal-Mart. But simply looking through your yellow pages, you could identify non-competing businesses that have outlets where you could sell your products and services through joint ventures.

Secondly, Starbucks discovered that music complemented its caffeine products. People who bought one would buy the other. Although it would be contrary to the company’s corporate philosophy, it could make a financial windfall by selling cigars and other tobacco-related products that also complement its drinks.

What could you profitably cross-sell that complements your existing line of products and services? Why not joint venture with someone who supplies such? You’re leaving money on the table if you don’t explore these options because your customers will never be in a better buying mood than at the time they’re already making a purchase from you.

Hat tip to Peter Lauria at the New York Post.