Are Social Media Employment Background Checks Legal?

social media employment background checks

What do you think of social media employment background checks?

FTC and Social Media Employment Background Checks

When it comes to social media employment background checks, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has indicated that it plans to hold employers gaining information about potential employees over the internet subject to the same accountability as employers who obtain information about prospective employees in more traditional ways.

This means, among other laws and regulations, that social media employment background checks must comply with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).

As the consumer protection branch of the federal government, the FTC works in part to protect the privacy and reputation value inherent in people’s names. This protection has extended to the FTC enforcing regulations whereby employers must do diligent research into the accuracy of data provided to them about potential future employees.

Traditionally, this research extended to ensuring the accuracy of official reports, like criminal history and previous employment statistics, but recent guidance by the Federal Trade Commission indicates that the FTC is looking at how employers make use of information on the internet.

Why Social Media Employment Background Checks Are Popular

Some companies make money by researching the backgrounds of individuals, and then selling the results of social media employment background checks to prospective employers who may hire those individuals. Employers value this information and are willing to pay money to know how successful potential employees might be with their company. Much of the information sold to employers by information gathering companies comes from internet websites such as Facebook, Linkedin, MySpace, and Twitter.

While often employers can learn a good deal about a job applicant by viewing his or her posts on the Internet, there are concerns about the accuracy of data provided to employers gathered this way. For example, online identity theft could, if undiscovered or not disrupted, cause employers to rely upon false information to reject a prospective employee.

The FTC recognizes this possibility and wants employers and their information providers to take additional steps to ensure that a potential employee is not rejected for a position because online identity theft tainted social media employment background checks.

Social Media Employment Background Checks and Identity Theft

Although FTC conditional approval of social media employment background checks does nothing to stop online pirates from stealing the identity of others, it does encourage employers to make sure information given to them is accurate. Online identity theft may always exist, but now employers know that the FTC may punish them for not verifying data used by them for hiring purposes is reasonably certain to be accurate.

Companies providing data to employers must also take heed of the FTC’s views. The Federal Trade Commission wants these research organizations to ensure that the data they provide to employers will not be used in a way contrary to the law. Responsibility, therefore, on the part of both employers and research firms providing them with the social media employment background checks, will perhaps lead to greater data accuracy albeit at the expense of a prospective employee’s privacy.

Of course, there remains the unresolved issue of whether sites like Facebook will be held liable by the government or in civil lawsuits for damages if they sell false information to firms who use it for social media employment background checks.

Don’t let your website get weinered

internet lawyer social media twitter

Talk with your Internet lawyer about a social media policy

You don’t have to be an Internet lawyer to know that Congressman Anthony Weiner was tweeting things he shouldn’t while working, using his employer’s computer equipment and office space to do it.

Fortunately for Congressman Weiner, his employer is the government so there’s unlikely to be a lawsuit against it as a defendant because of his misconduct.

But when you do business online, you don’t have that special privilege.

When your employees or freelancers are doing work on your behalf, the last thing you want is for them to embarrass you using Twitter, Facebook, or other social media.

Here’s what to do…

1. Pre-screen who does work for you. If nothing else, check them out through Google and a peek at their social media postings before they start working for you. If you’d be embarrassed by what you see online already, don’t use their services…because they’re likely post more stupid stuff while they’re working for you.

2. Put a written social media policy in place for your business that restricts what employees and freelancers can do while working for you. If they want to act like drunken clowns or perverts in social media, you don’t want your business’ reputation to get hurt because of it.

3. And if someone is acting like a fool in social media after they have done work for you, ask them to remove any reference they have made online to your business. Avoid being tied to their shenanigans by association.

4. If you have any questions about what is acceptable social media behavior from a legal standpoint, ask your Internet lawyer for help.

Best wishes,

-Mike the Internet lawyer

Outted by Twitter

internet attorney twitter identity privacy

Talk with your Internet attorney about Twitter privacy

This is significant to your Internet attorney and your business too. Twitter has just revealed the identity of a Twitter user, including his personal contact information.

Here’s what happened…

A local British government sued in California. Twitter caved and gave out the Tweeter’s name and contact information. Twitter  “passed the name, email address and telephone number of a south Tyneside councillor accused of libelling the local authority via a series of anonymous Twitter accounts.” – Twitter unmasks anonymous British user in landmark legal battle, UK Guardian (May 29, 2011)

Now the government is going after him for libel because of the content of his tweets.

If the Tweeter had wanted to protect his identity, he would have had to fly from the U.K. to California, hire a U.S. Internet attorney, and try to convince the court his information should not be released.

If you’ve been defamed in Tweets, this precedent is something to consider. It’s a lot of leverage because Twitter will apparently fold like a cheap suit instead of protecting user identities.

If you are posting content on Twitter under the impression your identity and contact info will be protected, don’t count on it. When in doubt, talk with your Internet attorney before posting something that could land you in legal hot water.

Best wishes,

-Mike the Internet attorney