A Montana blogger accused an attorney of being a thug and a thief.
Lawyer jokes aside, the attorney didn’t find the blog post funny and sued for defamation.
The federal judge hearing the case ruled that the blogger was not a “journalist” apparently because she didn’t have journalist credentials or experience, and wasn’t affiliated with a traditional media organization. Since she isn’t a journalist, the state shield law designed to protect journalists won’t apply.
Looks like the blogger is going to be on the hook for $2.5 million.
Unless reversed on appeal, this case will have a chilling effect on bloggers.
Related posts:







Hey Mike, been a long while.
I couldn’t help but read more about this when this came out. Subsequently I saw two articles that might be of interest:
http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/oregon/ordce/3:2011cv00057/101036/95/
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2011/12/07/investment-firm-awarded-2-5-million-after-being-defamed-by-blogger/
Thanks for blogging on the subject as well, especially on a lawyer’s POV.